Wedding deals manage have a tendency to suggest the timeframe inside the and this amarriage need to have chosen to take lay

step one. Yet, inside genealogy and family history, we knowthat for each and every rule there’s an exception. Good vexing area ofgenealogy is that no one most understands exactly how to put on the new exclusions orrules with one decisive adjective such as always, perhaps, probably,probably, an such like. It might be interesting in the event the there most other advice ofjointures are generated a-year otherwise two after a known wedding big date.

dos. Is there an enthusiastic extant dispensation towards wedding off ElizabethClifford and Sir Ralph Bowes have been 3rd cousins thru Henry Fitzhugh,3rd Lord Fitzhugh otherwise 4th cousins, once removed from the fifth LordClifford? That would restrict the relationship day.


Allegedly, if the a great dispensation is sought and provided, it can havebeen by one of several adopting the, that will can be found in the new correspondingregister publication, whether or not it endures:

Thomas Savage, Archbishop away from York 1501-1507Christopher Bainbridge, Bishop away from Durham 1507-1508, Archbishop out-of York1508-1514William Senhouse, Bishop out-of Durham 1502-1505Thomas Ruthall, Bishop from Durham 1509-1523Richard Leyburn, Bishop out of Carlisle 1502-1508John Cent, Bishop of Carlisle 1509-1520

5. In case your tenth Lord Clifford do get married in early 1487 [say January] andhas Elizabeth later where seasons, does the brand new chronology perhaps not performs?

John possession?

E created within the later 1487, Henry born within the 1488/nine, Joan within the ,etc. filling out the newest names of the upload of . In the event that (a) thechronology still functions; and you may (b) her matrimony bit wasn’t reduced; thenwe only have the newest 1505 pedigree from Henry VII’s which is within the oppositionto the fresh supposition you to definitely she are a valid child.

6. About your 1505 pedigree: Would be the Clifford daughters new onlyknown Henry VII relations excluded? Have there been someone else? If so,won’t you to reflect badly with this document because the a resource?

Out of contrasting We have produced from the brand new c.1505 Henry VII Interactions pedigreeswith the latest 1480-1500 Visitation of North pedigrees, that are

On the c.1505 Affairs pedigrees, the latest Clifford children are perhaps not listedin a good Clifford pedigree, but alternatively in the St. John pedigree. Just like the I’mnot always this new St. John members of the family, after the is the advice asit looks throughout the c.1505 pedigree, once the taken from brand new 1834 Coll. Greatest. etGen. post. The newest phrasing from inside the quotations is exactly whilst seems inthe 1834 post (pp. 310-311).

“No. XII.”Off my personal Lord Welles child, Sir Richard Rod, Mistress Verney, SirJohn St. John, along with other.”f.288, 296, 317, 318.”Margaret Duchess of Somerset got three husbands.” From the “John Duke ofSomerset” she had “My Woman the new King’s Mother.” who had “The King.” whohad “Prince “Of the “Sir Oliver Saint John, very first partner.” she got step three daus & 2 sons:

A good. “Edith, wedded so you’re able to Geoffrey Pole off Buckinghamshire.” That they had:A1. “Sir Richard Pole, Knt. married toward Woman Margaret, dau. from theDuke regarding Clarence.” That they had: “Harry. “A2. “Alianor, wedded so you’re able to Ralph Verney, Esq.” They had: “John Verney.—– [child, unnamed]. ——-[a different sort of child, unnamed].”

B. “John Ssint John, esq.” He’d four people:B1. “Sir John Saint John, Knight.” who had “Five daughters and oneson.”B2. “Anne, wedd. in order to Harry Lord Clifford.” They’d “Jane. Mabill.Henry chat avenue verification email, young man and you may heir. Anne. Thomas. Alianor.”B3. “Age, married so you’re able to Thomas Kent, Esq. away from Lincolnshire.”B4. “A good Nun away from Shaftesbury.”B5. “Oliver Saint John.”

C. “Dame Mary, wedded in order to Sir Richard Frognall.” That they had:C1. “Edmond Frognall and his brethren and you can sistren.” Having issueindicated, not entitled.C2. “E, wedded in order to Sir William Gascoigne, Knt.”

D. “Elizabeth, wedded basic on Lord Zouche; shortly after into the LordScrope regarding Bolton.” Issue:D1. [by the Zouche] ” Catesby.” That they had:”Elizabeth. George. John. William.”D2. [by Scrope] ” Conyers.” With issueindicated not titled.

Margaret Duchess of Somerset, from the “Lionel Lord Welles, last partner.”had: “John Viscount Welles, wedded Cecily, dau. away from K. Edward IV.” andthey had “Age.”

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *